2005-12-06
Apple Aperture
There was an article in the ArsTechnica about Apple Aperture. Not very good product from the author's point of view. And I was a little disappointed. But in the same time I had some feeling that the author paid just a little attention to the main benefit of Aperture - reviewing and selecting - the way no other software can.
And then I read a comment on the Slashdot with two key sentences:
I totally agree with the commenter from Slashdot. Can't help waiting to get Aperture.
By the way, there are limitations to RAM amount for running Aperture. There is a trick to avoid them:
You can use your amount of RAM instead of 700 mentioned above.
And then I read a comment on the Slashdot with two key sentences:
- A pro photographer is paid for his "eye"/ability to capture an image that is so desirable, someone wants to pay for it.
- Maybe the better article choice would have been to collect feedback from pros instead of assuming he "knows" all about it?
I totally agree with the commenter from Slashdot. Can't help waiting to get Aperture.
By the way, there are limitations to RAM amount for running Aperture. There is a trick to avoid them:
open the file info.plist (on the Aperture.app bundle)
<key>AELMinimumRAMSize</key>
<string>1000</string>
to
<key>AELMinimumRAMSize</key>
<string>700</string>
You can use your amount of RAM instead of 700 mentioned above.
Comments:
<< Home
Indeed Aperture is very nice. I only got it last week and I'm already impressed by its fluidity and speed. It offers a ton of advanced options in a real easy and simple interface. I won't ever need to import pictures with iphoto, and I only ever use Photoshop for montage because Aperture does the job really well. Well done Apple.
bonus, thanks for your comment!
I think that Aperture needs a lot of improvements (as well as Apple Motion). But currently it's a great product.
Post a Comment
I think that Aperture needs a lot of improvements (as well as Apple Motion). But currently it's a great product.
<< Home